TTT TOK Team Torunament 2016 - Info

[DHettNeck]

Spelar vi med dreads erratan från GW?

Eftersom de inte används av kompmallen, så nej.

[refabricated]

Är det verkligen meningen att det inte skall finnas en övre gräns på hur många kort man kan ha på handen i mission 3 & 4?
Om det är så, tappar man inte lite taktiska val i vilka man vill behålla osv?

Imo så skulle en gräns vara på sin plats.

[Spell Familiar]

Är det verkligen meningen att det inte skall finnas en övre gräns på hur många kort man kan ha på handen i mission 3 & 4?
Om det är så, tappar man inte lite taktiska val i vilka man vill behålla osv?

Imo så skulle en gräns vara på sin plats.

+1 på det.
Jag tycker jag lärde mig i Landskrona att man bör ha en max hand. Scorade 10-12 kort sista rundan mot Simons IG. Det gör, som Olof säger, en hel del beslut överflödiga.

[Alpharius]

I'd like that to be verified; regarding the dreads.

There is a difference between a faq and an errata.

All dreads (and helbrutes) got 4 attacks on the profile through the errata, not the faq.

[refabricated]

I'd like that to be verified; regarding the dreads.

There is a difference between a faq and an errata.

All dreads (and helbrutes) got 4 attacks on the profile through the errata, not the faq.

The extra attacks are NOT takein into consideration in the comp of them. Thus the erratad/faq:d dreads should not be valid. But this is only the comp-group speaking. If the TOs decide otherwise, then it's up to them to apply changes to the comp and the format.




Further, i _think_ we are playing by the SWEfaq and i _think_ it states that the erratas/faqs from GW are not as of yet applied.
Key-word beeing "think".

[Neth_Oni]

neither FAQ or Errata is going to be used until it's been officially released. No 4 attack dreads this time

[Alpharius]

Death watch dreads have 4 attacks on the statline in the codex.

A dread with 2 attacks is pretty much crap.

With 4 it goes to "might be okay'ish" - personally I don't see a need to increase the comp just because they get the number of attacks they should have had a long time ago.

I'm quite sure it won't alter the balance, meta or anything like that.

It's the FaQ that is a draft.

The errata from GW is official

[DHettNeck]

Death watch dreads have 4 attacks on the statline in the codex.

A dread with 2 attacks is pretty much crap.

With 4 it goes to "might be okay'ish" - personally I don't see a need to increase the comp just because they get the number of attacks they should have had a long time ago.

I'm quite sure it won't alter the balance, meta or anything like that.

It's the FaQ that is a draft.

The errata from GW is official

Well that's your opinion, but the kompmall clearly states that they are not used. It also comps 4A (SM and DW) dreads more than 2A dreads.

[Alpharius]

Edit; I see the difference in komp from 2A to 4A - but I'd rather pay the extra komp points and play with the official errata, than being stuck with old rules.

And I'd still like the tournament organizers to verify if we could play with the errata or not - as it is not the same as a FaQ.

[Hylander]

And I'd still like the tournament organizers to verify if we could play with the errata or not - as it is not the same as a FaQ.

We´ll answer this asap. Will just discuss it first within the group of organizing.